Latest Articles

California Mandates Disclosure of Physician Sexual Misconduct

By Erik Goldman, Editor

As Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Brett Kavanaugh faced off in the Senate, the state of California quietly passed a major piece of legislation on sexual misconduct, one that could provide patients with far greater protection against predatory physicians.

The Patient Right to Know Act will require any California physician placed on probation for sexual wrongdoings to disclose this fact to any and all patients before an appointment.

Gov Jerry BrownCalifornia Governor Jerry BrownPrior to this new rule, signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown in late September, physician probations--for whatever reason--were already public information: the Medical Board of California posts all such disciplinary actions in an online registry.

But it was up to a patient to: a) find out about the registry; and b) take action to look up her physician prior to any medical consultation. The reality is that few patients even knew this database existed, and those who did seek the information had to contend with an online system that was far from user-friendly.

Under the new law, which takes effect on July 1, 2019, any physician placed on probation after that date must proactively inform patients of the disciplinary action prior to booking an appointment. The rule emphasizes sexual misconduct, but also applies to probation for drug abuse, inappropriate prescribing, or any criminal activity that could potentially harm patients.

The Patient Right to Know Act affects any physician or surgeon licensed by the Medical Board of California, the California Board of Podiatric Medicine, and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California. It also applies to NDs licensed by the California Naturopathic Medicine Committee, as well as practitioners licensed by the state's Board of Chiropractic Examiners and the California Acupuncture Board.

California is the first state to enact mandatory disclosure of this kind.

Similar bills had been proposed twice before in the Golden State, but failed to win approval. This year, with the emergence of the #Me Too movement, and the take-downs of a host of prominent men on charges of sexual abuse, the idea garnered significantly greater support.

The California Medical Association has consistently opposed all such legislation, claiming that it is unfair and overly burdensome to doctors. The bill had strong support from a cohort of Tiffany Thomas LopezTiffany Thomas Lopez, a former Michigan State University athlete who was sexually abused by Dr. Larry Nassar. Thomas Lopez is among a number of women athletes who pushed for California's Patient Right to Know Act.Olympic athletes that endured sexual abuse from Dr. Larry Nassar, the USA Gymastics' team physician.

It also had the support of a number of consumer advocacy groups. In a comment posted on the Fierce Healthcare site, Lee Harris, President of the Consumer Attorneys of California, stated that doctors have always been required to report probations to their insurance companies, as well as to their hospitals and clinics, "but not t the people who are most at risk--their patients." Harris contends that Californians have a right to know if their physicians are on probation for sexual misconduct.

“There is never an excuse for secrecy about physician sexual assault, drug use or other devastating patient harm. The Patient Right to Know Act will finally begin giving patients the information they deserve and need to keep themselves safe,” said Carmen Balber, executive director of Consumer Watchdog, a non-profit advocacy organization.  “It took the public outcry for accountability in the face of the USC and Olympic team doctor abuse scandals, and the #MeToo movement, to overcome years of intransigence from the doctors’ lobby that stood in the way of greater transparency.”

The organization notes that the Medical Board of California puts roughly 124 physicians on probation annually.

END

 

Formulation Innovation: How New Science Shapes Supplement Product Development

By Erik Goldman, Editor

Research on the impact of various vitamins, minerals, fats, and other nutraceutical substances is progressing at a rapid pace, despite a regulatory system that prohibits supplement companies from using clinical data to make prevention or treatment claims.  None the less, inovative companies are translating new discoveries into a new wave of science-backed supplements.

Supplement Makers Take Action To Reduce Environmental Impact

By Kristen Schepker, Assistant Editor

Healthcare—with its reliance on single-use disposables—is one of the world’s biggest polluters. And the natural products and dietary supplements industries—despite their “clean, green, and healthy” values—do contribute to the deluge of trash and pollution. Fortunately, eco-conscious companies in the natural products sector are responding to the crisis, and leading the charge toward ecological sustainability.

How Supplement Companies Walk Their Wellness Talk

By Ellen Kanner, Contributing Writer

Nutraceutical companies like Klaire Labs, Lonza, and Metagenics appreciate a healthy bottom line, but they also value a healthy workforce. A company that makes a strong and sustained commitment to the health and wellbeing of its own employees is likely to be equally committed to ensuring the quality and safety of its products.

One Year On, CRN Sees Success With Online Supplement Registry

By Erik Goldman, Editor

In the 18 months since it launched, the Council for Responsible Nutrition's "Online Wellness Library" (OWL) has amassed labels and product information from 89 dietary supplement companies representing over 11,000 product labels. The library, an independent and voluntary project, is part of a broader supplement industry movement toward greater transparency and truthfulness.

Common Medicinal Herbs That Are Vulnerable to Adulteration

By Erik Goldman, Editor

All herbs, like all agricultural products, are potentially subject to contamination with microbes, pesticides, environmental toxins, and financially-motivated adulteration or mislabeling.Certain herbs, however, have been particularly vulnerable to economically-motivated adulteration.

Is the Time Right to Revise DSHEA?

By Erik Goldman, Editor

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) has certainly had its share of critics over the 25 years since it was signed into law by then-President Bill Clinton.Some contend the regulation is weak, and that it gives the supplement industry too much latitude, while providing too little consumer protection. On the other side, many argue that the law puts a stranglehold on truthful communication about supplements. Is the time right to revisit--and revise--this landmark law?